GIFTED CHILDREN EDUCATION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD- PRACTICAL STRATEGIES

doi>10.24250/JPE/1/2020/GK

  • Gabriela Kelemen „Aurel Vlaicu” University of Arad
Keywords: identification; education; strategies; special education; stimulation.

Abstract

The identification and education of gifted children at an early age remains a challenge and a priority objective of Romanian education. Undoubtedly, children have certain exceptional abilities when entering school, it is the educators` duty to identify these innate skills and to stimulate them so that they reach the performance level. The challenge of the school is to find the means and methods of early intervention to promote a differentiated education that will help the whole group to develop, but which will take into account individualities to promote learning according to the needs of the children. Stimulating the development of each child according to his/her abilities requires a flexible curriculum and differentiated and personalized teaching strategies. In our article we will outline some strategies used in educating gifted children by focusing education and instruction on the child.

References

Carpenter. H. (2010, August 18). 25 definitions of innovation [Web log

post]. Retrieved from http://cloudave.com/31/25-definitions-of-innovation

Davis, J. L., Moore, J. L., III. (Eds.). (2016). Gifted children of color

around the world: Diverse needs, exemplary practices, and directions for the

future. Bingley, England: Emerald.

Ford, D. Y. (2013). Recruiting and Retaining Culturally Different Students

in Gifted Education.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press

Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the

DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane, & T. Stambaught (Eds.), Leading change in gifted

education: The festschrift of Dr Joyce VanTassel-Baska.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Henshon, S. E. (2010). Master builder of bridges between research and

practice: An interview with Ann Robinson. Roeper Review, 32, 145-149

Kelemen, G., (2014), Identification and education of gifted children,

http://www.lap-publishing.com

Kelemen, G., (2014), Psycho pedagogy of gifted, Edited by Pro

Universitaria, Bucarest.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2010). 2010 pre-k-grade 12

gifted programming standards.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from

http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=546

Robinson, A. (2010, July). What can we learn from creative lives?

Biography as research. Paper presented at the 12th European Council for High

Ability, Paris, France.

Sawyer, R. K. (2008). The future of learning in the age of innovation.

Report prepared for utureLab and the U.K. Department for Children, Schools and

Families. Retrieved from http://www.beyondcurrenthorizons.org.uk/the-future-oflearning-

in-the-age-of-innovation

Steenbergen-Hu, S., Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on

high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39-53.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What

one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and

acceleration on K-12 student academic achievement. Review of Educational

Research, 86, 849-899.

Swanson, J. (2016). Drawing upon lessons learned: Effective curriculum

and instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse gifted learners. Gifted

Child Quarterly, 60, 172-191.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2015). The role of acceleration in policy development

in gifted education. In Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J.,

Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses

holding back America’s brightest students, Volume 2 (pp. 43-52). Iowa City: The

Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and

Talent Development, College of Education, University of Iowa.

Published
2020-04-28