EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL AND CULTURAL PLURALISM IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL
Abstract
The term ‘underachievement’ is widespread in modern educational discourse, invoked most frequently in relation to a perceived failure to reach ‘potential’. In this paper, it is suggested that such terms, though widely used, are highly problematic, masking ideological assumptions which concern socially constructed, culturally sensitive, subjective, and relative matters. In fact, underachievement is most often used to mean low academic attainment and the paper argues that this is already better understood in terms of well-known factors such as prior attainment, socioeconomic disadvantage, and systemic biases.ÂReferences
Benskin, F. (1994) Black children and underachievement in schools. London: Minerva Press. Boyd, D. & Bee, H. (2006) Lifespan development (ed). Boston MA: Pearson. Bruner, J. (1960) The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Carrington, B. & McPhee, A. (2008) Boys’ ‘underachievement’ and the feminization of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34 (2), 109–120. Clark, B. (1992) Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. New York: Macmillan. Conklin, A.M. (1940) Failures of highly intelligent pupils: A study of their behaviour. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Datar, A. & Sturm, R.(2006) Childhood overweight and elementary school outcomes. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 1449–1460. Department for Education and Skills (2005) Higher standards, better schools for all. Norwich: HMSO.
Dowdall, C.B. & Colangelo, N. (1982) Underachieving gifted students: Review and implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 179–184. Eliot, J.(2004) Overachievement: the new model for exceptional performance. Retrieved January 3, 2008, from ://www.enotalone.com/article/6452.html Fine, B. (1967) Underachievers: How they can be helped. New York: E.P.Dutton. Ford, D.Y.(1996) Reversing underachievement among gifted black students. New York: Teachers College Press. Foucault, M. (1991) What is enlightenment? In P.Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. Foucault, M. (2002b) So it is important to think? In J.Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault - London: Penguin. Pp. 32–50. Foucault, M. (2000a) Polemics, politics, and problematizations. In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), Michel Foucault – Ethics. London: Penguin. Pp.111–119. Foucault, M. (2000b) The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In Foucault, M. (2002c) The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge. Foucault, M. (2002d) 'Omnes et singulatim': Toward a critique of political reason. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault - Power. London: Penguin. Pp. 298–325. Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, J. (1961) Excellence. Can we be equal and excellent too? New York: Harper & Row. Gazeley, L. & Dunne, M. (2007) Researching class in the classroom: addressing the social class attainment gap in Initial Teacher Education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 33 (4), 409–424. Gillborn, D. (1990) ‘Race’, ethnicity and education. London: Unwin Hyman. Kelemen G., (2013), Didactica învăţământului primar şi preşcolar, Editura Universităţii “Aurel Vlaicu†Arad, 306 p. Rabinow, P. (Ed.), Michel Foucault – Ethics. London: Penguin. Pp.281–301. Foucault, M. (2002a) Questions of methods. In J.Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault - Power. London: Penguin. Pp. 223–238.19 19 Power. London: Penguin. Pp. 454–458
