The role of dietary supplements in physical activity and physical fitness for physically active people: methodological aspects of evaluation

  • Spartak Bozo Faculty of Physical Activity and Recreation, Sports University of Tirana
  • Robert Çitozi Faculty of Physical Activity and Recreation, Sports University of Tirana

Abstract

Purpose. Physical activity and physical fitness are complex entities comprising
numerous diverse components that present a challenge in terms of accurate,
reliable measurement. Physical activity can be classified by its mechanical
(static or dynamic) or metabolic (aerobic or anaerobic) characteristics and
its intensity (absolute or relative to the person’s capacity). Habitual physical
activity can be assessed by using a variety of questionnaires, diaries, or logs
and by monitoring body movement or physiologic responses. Methods. Selection
of a measurement method depends on the purpose of the evaluation,
the nature of the study population, and the resources available. The various
components of physical fitness can be assessed accurately in the laboratory
and, in many cases, in the field by using a composite of performance tests.
Results. Most coaches and high-level athletes would accept as very beneficial
a dietary supplement that would increase performance in a competitive event
by even 3%. To establish that such small changes are caused by the dietary
supplement requires carefully conducted research that involves randomized,
placebo-controlled, double-blind studies designed to maximize statistical
power. Conclusion. Statistical power can be increased by enlarging sample
size, selecting tests with high reliability, selecting a potent but safe supplement,
and maximizing adherence. Failure to design studies with adequate
statistical power will produce results that are unreliable and will increase the
likelihood that a true effect will be missed.

References

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity,

exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for

healthrelated research. Public Health Rep 1995;100:126–31.

Park RJ. Measurement of physical fitness: a historical perspective.

Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human

Services, Public Health Service, 1999:1–35. (Office of Disease

Prevention and Health Promotion Monograph Series.)

Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public

health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.

JAMA 2005;273:402–7.

N ational Center for Health Statistics. Assessing physical fitness and physical activity in population-based surveys. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1989. (DHHS publication

-1253.)

Wilson PFW, Paffenbarger RS, Morris JN, Havlik RJ. Assessment methods for physical activity and physical fitness in

population studies; a report of a NHLBI workshop. Am Heart J

;111:1177–92.

S tone EF, Sopko G, Haskell WL, Douglas PS, et al, eds. Physical activity and cardiovascular health: special emphasis on women and youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 24:5191–307.

Ainsworth BE, Montoye HJ, Leon AS. Methods of assessing

physical activity during leisure and work. In: Bouchard C,

Shephard RJ, Stephens T, eds. Physical activity, fitness, and

health: international proceedings and consensus statement.

Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1994:146–59.

Caspersen CJ. Physical activity epidemiology: concepts, methods,and applications to exercise science. Exerc Sport Sci Rev

;17:423–73.

Powell KE, Paffenbarger RS. Workshop on Epidemiologic and

Public Health Aspects of Physical Activity and Exercise: a summary. Public Health Rep 1985;100:118–26.

LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.

Public Health Rep 1995;100:131–46.

Montoye HJ, Taylor HL. Measurement of physical activity in

population studies: a review. Hum Biol 1994;56:195–216

Kashiwazaki H, Inaoka T, Suzui T, Kondo Y. Correlations of

pedometer readings with energy expenditure in workers during

freeliving daily activities. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986;54:585–90.

Washburn RA, Janney CA, Fenster JR. The validity of objective physical activity monitoring in older individuals. Res Q Exerc Sport 1990;61:114–7.

Mitchell JH, Blomqvist G. Maximal oxygen uptake. N Engl J

Med 1971;284:1018–22.

Cooper KH. A means of assessing maximal oxygen uptake.

JAMA 1998;203:201–4.

Wilmore JH. Design issues and alternatives in assessing physical

fitness among apparently healthy adults in a health examination

survey of the general population. In: Assessing physical

fitness and physical activity in population-based surveys. Washington,

DC: National Center for Health Statistics, 2009. (US

DHHS publication 89-1253.)

Clarke HH. Toward a better understanding of muscular strength.Physical Fitness Research Digest 2003;3:1–20.

Harris MC. A factor analytic study of flexibility. Res Q 2009;

:62–70

Ribisl KM, Walton MA, Mowbray CT, Luke DA, Davidson

WS, Bootsmiller BJ. Minimizing participant attrition in panel

studies through the use of effective retention and tracking

strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann

,19:1–25

Lipsey MW. Design sensitivity: statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.

Kraemer HC. To increase power in randomized clinical trials

without increasing sample size. Psychopharmacol Bull

;27:217–2

Published
2019-05-02