A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS IN TWO HIGH SCHOOLS WITH DIFFERENT STATUS REGARDING THE PHENOMENON OF BULLYING IN SCHOOLS
Bullying is described as a set of aggressive actions, characterized by
intent, repetition and an imbalance of forces. These characteristics refer to
the fact that the aggressor chooses a weaker victim, who will be
aggressively and repeatedly assaulted, usually in school. Wanting to explore
this topic locally through the eyes of the students, we conducted a research
to identify the differences in perception and attitude of the students from two
different high schools (a national college and a technological high school),
regarding this phenomenon. The main hypothesis is that tensions and
difficulties in the school environment can affect the attitudes of students
regarding violence. We applied a questionnaire to 72 students (36 from
each high school) from Sighetu Marmatiei. The results show that the
students from the technological high school, know more information about
bullying, and they consider this phenomenon to be less frequent compared
to the students from the national college, and the feeling of being safe at
school is greater. Students from both high schools expressed pro-victim
attitudes to a greater extent, but the attitude toward the aggressor was more
negative in the case of students from the national college and more positive
in the other school. We can conclude that if the academic standards of the
students are higher, there is more tension is the school atmosphere, which
can generate bullying situations and feelings of insecurity at school.
Arseneault, L. Bowes, L., Shakoor, S. (2010). Bullying victimization in
youths and mental health problems: 'much ado about nothing'?. Psychological
Medicine, 40(5), 717-729. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991383
Astor, R. A., Behre, W. J., Fravil, K. A., & Wallace, J. M. (1997). Perceptions of
School Violence as a Problem and Reports of Violent Events: A National Survey of
School Social Workers. Social Work, 42(1), 55-68, doi: 10.1093/sw/42.1.55
Bărbat, A. C. (2018). Transdisciplinar approaches in understanding addictions.
Social Research Reports, 10(2), 51-61.
Beldean-Galea, I., Mireştean, I. M., Irimie, S., Samoilă, C., Sandu, P., & Rusz, A.
(2016). Bullying behavior in school – specific form of school violence. Journal of
School and University Medicine, 3(3), 31-39.
Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of Bullying in the
Playground and in the Classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22-36.
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perceptionbehavior
link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
(6), 893-910. doi: 10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2063
Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group membership in
students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School
Psychology, 44, 51-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.002
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in
students' perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology,
(6), 617-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.02.001
Gavrila-Ardelean, M. (2014). Study Type Determinants Deviant Behavioral
Disorders in Teenagers from Different Residential Areas, Educatia Plus, 10(1),
Gavrila-Ardelean, M. (2017). Cyberbulling-ul si sanatatea mentala a copiilor, in
vol. Assessing Cyberbullying Perceptions, coord. Lile R., Ed. Eikon, Bucuresti, p.
Gavrila-Ardelean, M., Gavrila-Ardelean, L. (2017). Review of Need for Health
Education in The Bio-Psycho-Social Approach of Mental Health, Journal Plus
Education, 17 (1), 276-285.
Gavrila-Ardelean, M., Gavrila-Ardelean, L. (2018). Technology and the future, in
vol. Croire en la technologie: médiatisation du futur et futur de la médiatisation,
coord. M.A. Tudor, S. Bratosin, Les Arcs: Éditions IARSIC, p.76-83.
Goian, C. (2004). Deprinderi in Asistenta Sociala, Institutul European.
Goian, C. (2010). Zece categorii de inconsecvente semantice prezente in limbajul
asistentei sociale din spatula romanesc. Revista de Asistenta Sociala, nr 1/2010,79-
Goian.C. (2019). Parents Counseling for improving the capacity of socialization of
their preschool children. Journal Plus Education, XXV, no 2/2019, 122-130.
Hymel, S. & Swearer, S. (2008). Bullying: An Age-Old Problem That Needs New
Solutions. Educational Psychology Papers and Publications. Paper 135.
Jigău, M., Liiceanu, A., & Preoteasa, L. (coord.). (2006). Violența în scoală. Buzău:
Editura Alpha MDN.
Lodge, J. & Frydenberg, E. (2005). The Role of Peer Bystanders in School
Bullying: Positive Steps toward Promoting Peaceful Schools. Theory Into Practice,
Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., Genta, M. L., Giannetti, E., Fonzi, A., &
Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children's attitudes towards
bully/victim problems in schools. Aggressive Behavior, 23(4), 245-257. doi:
Neamțu, C. (2003). Aspecte ale asistenţei sociale în şcoală. In G. Neamțu (Coord.),
Tratat de asistență socială (pp. 829-857). Iași: Polirom.
Neamțu, G. (2003). Introducere în teoria asistenței sociale. In G. Neamțu (Coord.),
Tratat de asistență socială (pp. 25-57). Iași: Polirom.
Nesdale, D. & Scarlett, M. (2004). Effects of group and situational factors on preadolescent
children’s attitudes to school bullying. International Journal of
Behavioral Development, 28(5), 428-434. doi: 10.1080/01650250444000144
Netzelmann, T. A., Steffan, E., & Angelova, M. (2016). Strategii pentru o clasă
fără bullying. Salvați copiii. Retrieved from http://listen.animusassociation.org/wpcontent/
uploads/2016/09/manual-rom-web.pdf, Accessed at 06.08.2019.
Organizația salvați copiii. (2016). Bullying-ul în rândul copiilor. Studiu sociologic
la nivel național. Retrieved from
, Accessed at 20.07.2019.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden,
MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
Protogerou, C. & Flisher, A. (2012). Bullying in schools. Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry and Mental Health, 119-133. Retrieved from
Accessed at 05.08.2019.
Randall, P. (1995) A Factor Study on the Attitudes of Children to Bullying.
Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(3), 22-26, doi: 10.1080/0266736950110304
Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of Bullying in Schools. The Canadian Journal of
Psychiatry, 48(9), 583-590. doi: 10.1177/070674370304800904
Sanders, C. E. & Phye, G. D. (2004) Bullying: implications for the classroom.
London: Elsevier Academic Press.
Smith, P. K. & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of
research. Aggressive Behavior, 26(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-
Smokowski, P. R. & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in School: An Overview of
Types, Effects, Family Characteristics, and Intervention Strategies. Children &
Schools, 27(2), 101-110.
Staples, J. (2016). Understanding School Social Workers’ Roles in Bullying
Prevention and Intervention. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University
repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/693, Accessed at
Swami, V., Mohd. Khatib, N. A., Vidal-Mollón, J., Vintila, M., Barron, D., Goian,
C., Mayoral, O., Lin Toh, E. K., Tudorel, O., Vazirani, S., & Zahari, H. S. (2019).
Visits to Natural Environments Improve State Body Appreciation: Evidence from
Malaysia, Romania, and Spain. Ecopsychology.
Thornberg, R., Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Jungert, T. (2015). Unique and Interactive
Effects of Moral Emotions and Moral Disengagement on Bullying and Defending
among School Children. The Elementary School journal, 2(116), 322-337. doi:
Trancă, L. M. (2018). School Dropout: A Case Study on Prevention Measures.
Agora Psycho-Pragmatica, 12(2), 197-207.
Trancă, L. M. (2020). Role of Social Workers and Current Difficulties Faced by
Social Workers in the Prevention of School Dropout in Western Romania. Social
Work Review, 19(1), 157-168.
Tudorel, O. I., Macsinga, I., & Virga, D. (2013). Actualizarea de sine: de la starea
de bine la viziunea asupra lumii. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 15(1),
Tudorel, O. I., & Vintila, M. (2020). The Benefits and Consequences of Using
Modern Information and Communication Technology. Revista de Asistenţă Socială,
Tudorel, O. I., Vintilă, M., Vlaicu, L., Bălăuță, D., Goian, C., & Rusu, A. (2019).
Romanian Version of the Internet Addiction Test: Psychometric Properties and
Cross-Gender Invariance. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,
(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0014-6
Tudorel, O., & Vintilă, M. (2018). The role of social suppor on Internet addiction.
Revista de Asistenţă Socială, 1, 73–78.
Vintilă, M., Tudorel, O. I., Goian, C., & Bărbat, C. (2018). Determining the
structure of smartphone addiction scale: A bifactor model analysis. Current