• Alois GHERGUȚ
Keywords: inclusive education; special needs education (SEN); school inclusion; disabilities.


The school for diversity allowed for a new approach to the learning
activities in school, which is also determined by the need to ensure equal
opportunities for access to education for all members of a community. In
this respect, many studies have evaluated teacher attitudes towards the
integration and inclusion of children with special educational needs in
schools. Our research aimed at identifying a significant relationship
between the attitudes of teachers in mass education on the school inclusion
of students with SEN and the underlying factors. The group of subjects
included a total of 961 teachers in primary and middle education in
Romania. The findings of the research have shown the existence of a
diversity of attitudes, perceptions and opinions about the opportunity of
integrating students with SEN into mainstream education; some perceptions
highlight the role and importance of common learning experiences in a
school and focus on the need for special efforts by all actors involved, both
at system and school level. There are also opponents who do not exploit this
educational practice in schools in our country, but are rather attached to
the traditional model partially characterized by numerous prejudices,
stereotypes and negative attitudes towards students with SEN.

Author Biography


“AlexandruIoanCuza” University ofIași,
Toma Cozma Street, no. 3, Iasi


Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream

teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational ordinary

school in one local education authority.Educational psychology, 20(2), 191-211.

Avramidis, E., Norwich, B. (2002). Teacher's attitudes towards

integration/inclusion: a review of the literature.European Journal of Special Needs

Education, 17(2), 129-147.

Barton, L; Oliver, M. (1992).Special Needs: Personal Trouble or Public

Issue in VircingConcernes: Sociological Peespectives on Contemporary Education

Reforms. Triangle Books Ltd, London.

Beh-Pajooh, A. (1992). The effect of social contact on college

teachers’attitides towards student with severe mental handicap and their

educational integration.European Journal of Special Needs, No. 7, 231-236.

Biklen, D. (1992).Schools without Labels: Parents, Educators and Inclusive

Education. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

Clough, P., Lindsay, G. (1991).Integration and the Support Service, Slough:


Croll, P., Mores, D. (2000). Ideologies and utopias: educational

professionals’ view of inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education,


Dessent, T. (1987).Making the Ordinary School Special, London :Falmer.

Dickens-Smith, M. (1995). The effect of inclusion training on teacher

attitude towards inclusion. Chicago, IL: Chicago Public Schools. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED381486).

Ellins, J., Porter, J. (2005). Departmental differences in attitudes to special

educational needs in the secondary school.British Journal of Special Education, 32,


Forlin, C. (1995).Educators beliefs about inclusive practices in Western

Australia.British Journal of Special Education, 22, 179 – 185.

Fulcher, G. (1989).Disabling Policies. A Comparative Approach to

Education Policy and Disability.Falmer Press, London.

Hastings, R. P., Oakford, S. (2003). Student Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the

Inclusion of Children with Special Needs.Educational Psychology, 23, 88-94.

Hornby, G. (2001). Promoting responsible inclusion: quality education for

all.Enabling Inclusion: Blue skies....Dark clouds?, ed. By O’Brien, T. London: The

Stationery Office.

Janney, R. F., Snell, M. E., Beers, M. K., Raynes, M. (1995). Integrating

with moderate and severe disabilities into general education classes.Exceptional

Children, 61, 425–439. 115.

Jordan, A., Lindsay, L.,Stanivich, P. J. (1997). Classroom teachers

instructional children interactions with students who are exceptional, at risk and

typically achieving.Remedial and Special Education, 18, 82–93.

Lerner, J. W. (1997). Learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis and

teaching strategies. 7th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Leyser, Y. ,Kapperman, G. And Keller, R. (1994).Teachers attitudes toward

mainstreaming.European Journal of Special Neds, 9, 1-15.

Melero, M.L. (1990).La integracion escolar otracultura. Junta Andalucia,


Mushoriwa, T., D. (2001). A study of the attitudes of primary school

teachers in Harare towards the inclusion of blind children in regular classes.British

Journal of Special Education, 28, 142-147.

Norwich, B. (1994).The relationship between attitudes to the integration of

children with special needs and wider socio – political views.European Journal of

Special Neds, 9, 91-106.

Salvia, J., Munson, S. (1986).Attitudes of regular education teachers toward

mainstreaming mildly handicapped students. Meissel, C.J. (ed.) Mainstreming

Handicapped Children: Outcomes, Controversies, and New Directions. London:

Lawrence Erlbaum, 111-128.

Shimman, P. (1990). The impact of special needs students at a Further

education College: A report on a questionnaire.Journal of Further and Higher

Education, 14, 83-91.

Soodak, L. C., Podell, D. M., Lehman, L. R. (1998). Teacher, student, and

school attributes as predictors of teachers’ responses to inclusion.Journal of Special

Education, 31, 480–497.

Todd, J. (2001). Enabling inclusion for individuals.Enabling Inclusion:

Blue skies....Dark clouds?, ed. By O’Brien, T. London: The Stationery Office.

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Jallad, B., Slusher, J., Samuel, L. (1996).

Teachers’ views of inclusion.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(2),

pp 96-106.

Wayne, S. (1989).The Comprehensive local school: Regular education for

all students with disabilities. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes Pub. Co.

Ward, J., Center, Y.,Bochner, S. (1994). A question of attitudes: integrating

children withdisabilities into regular classrooms. British Journal of Special

Education, 21, 34-39.