TEACHERS’ OPINIONS REGARDING TEACHING AN INTEGRATED OPTIONAL DISCIPLINE (IOD) IN ROMANIAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Alina Ioana PhD student University of Bucharest, Romania
  • Maria GOGA University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, Romania

Keywords:

competencies, integrated curriculum, obstacles, secondary schools, teaching an integrated optional discipline,

Abstract

Curriculum integration is a necessity. In everyday life, problem solving requires
knowledge, diverse skills that cannot be acquired by studying only individual
disciplines, with no connections between them. This study explores the views of the
teachers in the secondary schools, in Romania, on teaching an integrated optional
discipline. We have designed and carried out a mixed research – quantitative and
qualitative, based on several objectives focused on teachers’ opinions to teach an
IOD, the required competencies to teach an IOD, their perceived barrieres in
teaching an IOD and possible solutions to overcome those barriers. We did our
research in 18secondary schools from Bucharest city and five counties, on a sample
of 153 teachers. The results of the research show that only few teachers teach IOD in
Romania. In order to teach an IOD, they need to have social skills and creativity
besides knowlege from different areas. Theachers state that there is a lack of
curricular resources and time to prepare the lessons. Also, they have difficulties in
making connections between the knowlege from different areas. Teachers consider
that in order to solve these problems, they need to help each other, to study more and
suggest that schools must support them with diverse curricular materials.

References

Ciolan, L. (2008). Învățarea integrată. Fundamente pentru un curriculum transdisciplinar.

Iași: Editura Polirom;

Dewey, J. (1972). Democrație și educație. O introducere în filosofia educației. București:

Editura Didactică și Pedagogică;

Dewey, J. (1977). Trei scrieri despre educație. Copilul și curriculumul. Școala și societatea.

Experiență și societate. București: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică;

Dowden, T. (2010). Integrated curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand: Rediscovering the

potential of student-centered curriculum design in the middle years. Australian Journal of

Middle Schooling, 10(2), pp. 4-10;

Drake, S. M.; Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum.

Virginia: ASCD;

Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: a stand

for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 3(3), 185–

;

Gresnigt, R. et al. (2014). Promoting science and technology in primary education: a review

of integrating curricula. Studies in Science Education Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, pg. 47-84;

Hall-Kenyon, K. M., Smith, L. K. (2013). Negotiating a shared definition of integrated

curriculum: a self -study of two teacher educators from different disciplines. Teacher

Education Quarterly, Spring 2013, pg. 89-108;

Hulstrand, J. (2012). Integrated curriculum: It’s a marathon, not a sprint. International

Educator, ProQuest Central, Sept/Oct 2012, 21, 5; pag. 48-51;

Iosifescu, Ș. (2012). Analiza mediului școlar în raport cu implementarea reformei

curriculare. București: CNEE;

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: design and implementation. Alexandria,

USA: ASCD

John, Y. J. (2015). A â€new†thematic, integrated curriculum for primary schools of Trinidad

and Tobago: a paradigm shift. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 3;

Munroe, A. (2015). Integrated curriculum in the general music classroom. General Music

Today, Vol. 29 (1), pag. 12-18;

Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative

research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344;

Potolea, D. (1983). Interdisciplinaritatea conținutului învățământului; o tipologie și câteva

implicații. Revista de Pedagogie nr. 8, pg. 58-62;

Potolea, D, Toma, S., Borzea, A. (coord.). (2012). Coordonate ale unui nou cadru de

referinţă al curriculumului naţional, Bucureşti: CNEE;

Stohlman, M., Moore, T.J., Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated

STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). Vol.

, Issue 1, pg. 2-34;

Wagner, T., Baum, L., Newbill, P. (2014). From rhetoric to real world: fostering higher order

thinking through trans disciplinary collaboration. Innovation in Education and Teaching

International, vol. 51, no. 664-673;

*** ISE (2015). Repere pentru proiectarea și actualizarea Curriculumului Național.

Document de politici eduaționale. Versiune de lucru. Retrieved from:

https://www.ise.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Document-politicicurriculum_

final_23decembrie.pdf;

*** OMEN 4828 privind modificarea și completarea Ordinului ministrului educației

naționale și cercetării științifice nr. 3590, privind aprobarea planurilor-cadru de învățământ

pentru învățământul gimnazial RO (2018).

Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Pl_cadruactuale/

Gimnaziu/OMENCS%203590_5%20apr%202016_Plancadru%

de%20%C3%AEnvatamant%20pentru%20gimnaziu.pdf;

*** OMENCS nr. 3590 privind aprobarea planurilor-cadru de învățământ pentru

învățământul gimnazial RO (2016).

Retrieved from http://programe.ise.ro/Portals/1/Curriculum/Pl_cadruactuale/

Gimnaziu/omen-4828.pdf ;

Downloads

Published

2019-06-01