ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN THE PSYCHOLOGIST’S PRACTICE THAT ACTIVATES IN THE AREA OF CHILDREN WITH IMPAIRMENTS

Authors

  • Mircea Adrian MARICA Associate Professor Ph.D. Ovidius University ConstanÈ›a, Romania
  • Angelica NASTASE Psychologist, ConstanÈ›a, Romania

Keywords:

ethical dilemmas, confidentiality, integrity, self-disclosure, competencies

Abstract

The reconstruction of the profession of psychologist in Romania faced an alert rhythm by a continuous normative and administrative structuring. At present we are in front of some necessary functional optimizations and procedural refining meant to satisfy the exigencies of an efficient psychological practice. An important component of the professionalization of the domain, together with the competency, is the ethical dimension of the professional practice. In this dimension, still insufficiently elaborated and investigated, is placed the present research. The gathering of factual material by empirical researches creates the premises both for normative improvements and for reconfigurations of the ethical management system of the profession. In our study we identified a number of 52 behaviors that may generate hesitation in the professional decision and we questioned the practicing psychologists from the area of children with impairments about the frequency of those situations that they met during their activity, and then I requested them the assessment of those behaviors from the correctness point of view. There were used both in obvious situations and in ambiguous situations, regarding the confidentiality, competencies, integrity, conflict of interests, tariffs and payments modalities, multiple relations, discrimination, familiarity,  self-disclosure, intimate relations, etc. The statistical processing of the answers aimed comparisons between the frequency of the psychologists engagement in the respective behaviors and the assessment of their correctness, based on sex, age, seniority in profession, working place (private/state), courses of professional training attended etc.

References

Borys, D.S; Pope, K.S., (1989), â€Dual Relationships between Therapist & Client: A National Study of Psychologists. Psychiatrists, and Social Workersâ€, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 20, issue #5, 283- 293

Fenning, S., et all, (2005), â€Ethical Dilemmas in Psichotherapy: Comparison Betwen Patients, Therapists and Laypersonsâ€, Israel Journal Of Psychiatry And Related Sciences, vol.42, no.4, 251-257

Holman, A., 2013, “Ethical Controversies Regarding The Use Of Deception In The Psychological Researchâ€, Revista Română de Bioetică [Roumanian Journal of Bioethics], vol. 11, no.1, 51-64

Lindsay, G.; Clarkson, P., 1999, â€Ethical Dilemmas of Psychotherapistsâ€, The Psychologist. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, vol.12, no.4, 182–185

Lusar, A. C., 2007, (coord), Etica del Psicologo, Barcelona: Editorial UOC

Pettifor, J. L.; Tyson R. Sawchuk, 2006, â€Psychologists’ perceptions of ethically troubling incidents across international bordersâ€, International Journal of Psychology, 41 (3), 216–225

Platon, 1993, Charmides, in Platon, Dialoguri, Iași: Agora, p.148

Pope, K.S.; Tabachnick, B.G.; Keith-Spiegel, P., 1987, â€Ethics of Practice: The Beliefs and Behaviors of Psychologists as Therapistsâ€, American Psychologist, vol. 42, #11, 993-1006

Pope, K. S.; Vetter, V. A., 1992, â€Ethical Dilemmas Encountered by Members of the American Psychological Association: A National Surveyâ€, American Psychologist, vol. 47, no. 3, 397-411

Urra, J., 2008, Psicologia y Deontologia: Estudio Empirico Basado en Dilemas, Eticos, Spania, cf. http://www.javierurra.com/files/DilemasEticos.pdf

www.apa.org/ethics/code

www.copsi.ro

Downloads

Published

2017-05-04